Open Access

Table 1

Summary of demographic data and results from the study.

Sr no. Age in years Gender Anatomical location Follow up in months MSTS scores Range of motion Campanacci grading
1 24 Female Distal femur 30 28 0–120 2
2 19 Female Proximal Tibia 26 30 0–120 2
3 27 Male Distal Femur 24 22 0–90 2
4 32 Female Distal Femur 36 24 0–100 2
5 18 Female Proximal Tibia 30 27 0–120 2
6 25 Male Distal Femur 24 25 0–90 3
7 21 Female Distal Femur 28 26 0–110 3
8 29 Male Proximal Tibia 25 28 0–120 2
9 18 Female Proximal Tibia 31 26 0–120 2
10 22 Female Distal Femur 28 15 20–60 3
11 26 Male Proximal Tibia 30 26 0–110 3
12 24 Female Distal femur 36 24 0–110 3
13 21 Male Distal femur 26 28 0–120 2
14 23 Male Proximal Tibia 28 20 20–90 2
15 27 Female Distal femur 30 25 0–120 3
16 28 Female Proximal Tibia 28 27 0–120 2
17 19 Male Distal femur 34 25 10–100 3
18 23 Female Proximal Tibia 32 28 0–120 2
19 18 Female Distal femur 36 27 0–120 2
20 19 Male Proximal Tibia 26 27 0–120 2
21 22 Female Proximal Tibia 40 25 0–110 2
22 29 Male Proximal Tibia 32 25 0–110 3
23 32 Male Distal femur 38 20 10–90 3
24 34 Male Distal femur 28 24 0–100 2
25 21 Female Distal femur 30 28 0–110 2